🌉 Is The Ps3 Slim Better Than The Original

Am thinking to buy a used PS3.Understand from list above the best mod-able is PS3 fat & PS3 slim (20xx & 21xx). Will mainly use the PS3 to play backups of PS3, PS2, PS1, PSP roms that will be transferred from windows PC to PS3 hard drive. With PS3HEN would the PS3 slim 3xxx & PS3 super slim 4xxx be able to do that ? as these models are more Here's the short answer: maybe. A slim PS3 cannot run PS2 games unless it's jailbroken and has the proper software to load the games as ISO files, and even then it doesn't support all games as it does not have the required PS2 hardware. Here's the long and fully detailed answer that should give you enough information to make the best decision PS3 Guide - PlayStation 3 Guide - IGN. PS3 "Slim" vs. "Fat". Launched in November 2006, PlayStation 3 had a rough first year but has gone on to become an excellent gaming machine and every bit the PlayStation 3 (120GB) PlayStation 3 opens up new possibilities for thrills and excitement. The built-in Blu-ray Disc player allows you to step into the world of high-definition entertainment, from intricately detailed and explosively powerful video games to favorite movies that come to life on screen with new depth and clarity. In addition, the PS3 Slim was released in September 2009, just under three years after the original PS3 had launched in November 2006. As anyone can see, there's a three-year pattern, @jorel262 PS3 Slim was a lot smaller than the original or subsequent fatties (60GB, 40GB, 80GB). I think we can ignore the PS3 Super Slim as that was smaller again but tacky in every way. PS Vita Slim vs PS Vita – A look at the dimensions and design. The new Vita Slim isn’t a huge departure from the original Vita in terms of design, but there are some changes. Sony has made the The PS3 slim also does not have this feature, but it was lost more than a year before the PS3 slim was released back in 2008 and even in November 2007 for the 40 GB model YES as long as the ps3 is The PlayStation 3 Super Slim weighs at least 25% less than the Slim due in part to the slot-loading Blu-ray drive being replaced with a top-load disc reader similar to the original PlayStation's, but with a sliding cover. Power consumption This is in keeping with previous 'Slim' models – the PS4 Slim was 40 per cent smaller than the original PS4, while the PS3 Slim was 33 per cent slimmer than the standard PS3, 36 per cent lighter On the flipside, the Super Slim uses less power. Noise is about the same on both. Super Slim might be more quiet on paper, but my ears can't tell the difference. They're both not the best looking consoles, but that shouldn't really matter. To me it's all about ease of use, power consumption, and noise level. this. cost wise it's better in the long run, because ps3 with ps2 chips are ticking timebombs for the most part unless you dedicate some serious effort into it. ps3 slim will play any ps3 game and ps1 game (that you care about) via emulation, with the (so far) best track record of it staying in working condition. .

is the ps3 slim better than the original